You’ve got your low cost airlines, and then you’ve got your ultra-low cost airlines.
Frontier has a new pricing structure. Base fares are going down. But if you want to use the overhead bin, it’l be $20 for frequent fliers who book online…
One more airline I’ll never fly.
Amanda Little writes about a recent debate between Michael Pollan and Pamela Ronald, a prominent plant geneticist and a professor at U.C.-Davis, over G.M.O. foods: http://nyr.kr/1rrzURm
“It’s not easy for anyone, let alone a plant geneticist who spends fifty hours a week directing a large laboratory, to persuade a crowd of young activists to shift their thinking on one of the most contentious environmental debates of our time.”
Photograph of Pamela Ronald by Roy Kaltschmidt.
Buried toward the end is perhaps the most sensible way I frame my modest and still-questioning concerns around GMOs.
“ “I haven’t read anything to convince me that there are inherent problems with the technology. I think most of the problems arise from the way we’re choosing to apply it, what we’re using it for, and how we’re framing the problems that it is being used to solve,” he said.”
The Emerging Foundation For The Future Of Work
Benedict Evans has a great piece that confirms what many have been saying: smartphone adoption is an enormous game changer:
Benedict Evans, iPads and tablet growth
[…] the smartphone explosion is putting the internet into the hands of far more people than ever before, and it’s alway there. If you’re watching TV and want to know about an actor or a product, do you go upstairs and turn on your PC, walk across the room to pick up a tablet, or just pull a smartphone out of your pocket? The declining relative utility of the PC is reflected in a slowing replacement cycle (you don’t replace the one you have) – the tablet has yet to make the sale in the first place, outside the initial wave of adopters.
Compounding this, the smartphone explosion is accompanied by an apps explosion. There are thousands of amazing apps on iPad (and very few on Android tablets, which is why the balance of use between the two is so skewed), but the smartphone opportunity is so much bigger that it attracts much more attention: there are more of these devices, some use cases make much more sense on them (such as Instagram) and some only make sense on them (such as Uber, Hailo or Lyft). So the smartphone experience now is very rich.
The charts say it all. We are in a smartphone world, and it will change everything from top to bottom, and those impacts are only being hinted at, with the first changes showing up in the decline of the old ways: PC sales and desktop software sales, including use of web-based apps that are designed for browser use. We are starting to see the rise of the new ways, like the explosion of phone-friendly messaging apps, for personal and work use.
There is a revolution about to happen, a new era of computing based on increasingly powerful smartphones, ubiquitous connectivity, and context-driven apps that leverage the information latent in our actions and connections.
Expect that 50% of existing enterprise software companies will not be able to make this transition, despite being well-capitalized and running on millions of computers. At least half of the winners in the next 10 years will be startups, many that don’t exist yet.
Context-driven cooperative work tools on smartphones is the emerging foundation for the future of work.
Seems obvious and yet there aren’t enough options out there for truly collaborative phone apps. Too many try to solve things the same way as we did on the PC. The lesson should be that it’s different, it’s not just a tiny PC.
Enterprise software sucks.
We don’t talk about it much here at hn, but think about it. Every man-made object you encounter every day was manufactured somewhere. And moved, more than once. Now add in all the sales, marketing, customer service, operations, accounting, finance, human resources, etc., etc., etc. needed to support that manufacturing and distribution. Next, add financial markets, healthcare, energy, entertainment, etc., etc., etc. and you have tons of stuff. But you don’t see it and rarely think about it. Kinda like most of the iceberg being underwater.
And all of this needs software. And most of what they have sucks. I mean really sucks. Enterprise software is so bad that there are multi-billion dollar industries devoted to consulting on how to use it, how to share it, and how to store it in data warehouses and harvest it. It’s so bad that lots of people have to dump the data out of their enterprise systems and into Microsoft Excel just to get anything done.
When Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he said because that’s where the money is.
What banks were in the 1930’s, enterprise IT is in the 21st century.
via Hacker News
In our ongoing theme around the challenges of enterprise tech (to put it mildly), we found this classic thread from Hacker News from a few years back. Guess what? Nothing much as changed.
At Enhatch, we are doing our very best to rethink the way business apps get created and deployed to users. For one, we believe most needs in the enterprise could easily be handled by elegantly crafted apps that are available on mobile devices. That is where employees are spending more and more of their day doing work and the device they are most comfortable with. But more importantly, why are we not giving business users the ability to create their own apps and their own processes that conform to the way they work? Maybe users, and not IT department or outside consultants, know best as to what they want and when they need it and how to get it done.
It is time we rob the enterprise IT vendors and raid the armies of the systems integrators, and like Robin Hood bring joy, riches, and freedom to the users from the tyranny of bad technology.
Absolutely right. Enterprise software is terrible and years behind what consumers use. Some of it is embarrassingly bad, eg every corporate travel site.
There are two ways to deal with this. One, software companies could focus on enterprise. Two, enterprise companies could embrace what is out there for consumers.
I’d bet on the latter.
One of the biggest problems with stopping city bike theft is that cities don’t even understand the extent of the problem. Police departments often consider the incidents a low priority and fail to pursue thieves, which in turn…
The question one needs to ask: who buys these stolen bikes? If there wasn’t a market then there would be no value in stealing them. How much focus is there on the end game?